T. L. Thompson https://www.authortlthompson.com Speculative Fiction | Speculative Freedom Tue, 05 May 2020 04:09:20 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.3 https://www.authortlthompson.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/cropped-logo-1-min-32x32.png T. L. Thompson https://www.authortlthompson.com 32 32 The Tangled Tendrils of Time Travel: A Review of Netflix’s Travelers https://www.authortlthompson.com/the-tangled-tendrils-of-time-travel-a-review-of-netflixs-travelers/ Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:38:16 +0000 http://www.authortlthompson.com/?p=316 + Read More]]>

Welcome to the 21st.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

]]>
Mock the Moon, Magician: A Season Without Quentin Coldwater https://www.authortlthompson.com/mock-the-moon-magician-a-season-without-quentin-coldwater/ Sat, 29 Feb 2020 19:15:32 +0000 http://www.authortlthompson.com/?p=284 + Read More]]>

So, here we are. Existing in this post-Quentin Coldwater existence. How are you handling it?

I am dealing as well as one can be. A Quentin stan to the core, there is a huge hole in the show that is intriguing to experience. The Magicians getting a Season 5 was no surprise to me. In fact, I welcomed it. I love the show. The writing is phenomenal, the characters are complex, the worldbuilding is fantastic, and the acting is stellar.

Hats off to Lev Grossman of course for penning the novels the show is based off, but the television adaptation really really works.

In case you’re wondering, I have not read the entire book series. I read the first book and balked at continuing because I found myself really gelling with his thought process. The way he thinks about magic and magical theory is exactly how I do, so I am avoiding his work until I have my own out in the world. Sue me.

Anyway, I was intrigued to see the ripple effect Quentin’s death would have on the show’s newest season, story wise  and from a more meta storytelling perspective. 

Some would say it isn’t fair to hang the show’s continuing success on the lack of Jason Ralph’s stellar depiction of Curly Q.

But guess what?

There’s a lot to love about Quentin and the role he played in the show’s narrative.

The Volunteer Tomato that always showed up to save the day, despite the fact that he wasn’t the smartest, the strongest, the fiercest, the bravest. He wasn’t even the most fucked up character in a world that emphasized the fact that power comes from fucked up shit happening to you. 

What he represented was a breath of fresh air for those of us sick of the Chosen One trope, a staple of the fantasy genre. Instead, we had an anxious character with depth and mental illness and a unrepentant love of magic and Fillory that got knocked around over and over but kept showing up because he could.

Because he chose to. 

Julia was God-Touched. Alice the Marie Curie of Magic, Kady, the Warrior, Margo the Destroyer. Elliott the Queer Icon. Penny the Traveler.

But Quentin was the catalyst. Fighting, failing, and fumbling his way through but there nonetheless, moving forward and making things happen because it needed to get done and no one else was stepping up.

Now, down to brass tacks.

The new season has managed to hold my interest so far. The writers inserted a new mystery, a new threat in Fillory, end of the world stakes, and more magical hijinks, both hilarious and eerie. I am a sucker for great magical development, so there’s that.

In fact, I was just playing around with a werewolf novel idea, called Lunatic, when the Moon episode aired and the Lunatics were discussed. (See, mine and Lev’s minds are melded). The fact that the moon has moods and we delve so deeply into circumstances this season is wonderful. The outcome of cracking the moon and the time loop scenario that resulted made me smile, while also scared for Elliot and his sanity. 

The saga of the Dark King is fascinating and that whole “will they, won’t they?” with Elliot is great. I am always here for a queer speculative storyline.

My major issue with what is going on is the lack of threadweaving I see going on. I don’t need storylines to be wrapped up neatly in a bow, but I do like to feel that the revelations being made in this season have their roots in earlier ones, and I am just not getting that. The mystery page of Quentin’s, the Dark King, the Whales, the Marauders…

New season equals new challenges of course, but let’s make sure we’re not throwing things to the wall and seeing what sticks. 

Long story short, I am not sure how long this show will last without him. They had a good run, but we shall see if they go for a Sixth season. 

I am betting not.

Until Next Time!

]]>
Picard’s Final Pilgrimage: Thoughts About Patrick Stewart’s Return to the Trek Verse https://www.authortlthompson.com/picards-final-pilgrimage-thoughts-about-patrick-stewarts-return-to-the-trek-verse/ Fri, 31 Jan 2020 20:05:47 +0000 http://www.authortlthompson.com/?p=267 + Read More]]>
Star Trek: Picard

Trek fans all over the world were excited when news dropped that Patrick Stewart would be reprising his role as Jean-Luc Picard. Diehard TNG fans raved in excitement. Casual fans perked up. Even those soured on the Star Trek verse due to the reboot movies and/or Discovery (haters) peeked through their digital curtains to follow along.

I have to admit that I was never a huge Picard fan. I found him to be overly pious and holier-than-thou. Glaringly white in a galaxy full of grays. Picard the person will never have my love, but, as all valid people are, I am a Patrick Steward stan till the end, so I was cautiously optimistic.

And so far, I am into this new chapter of the Star Trek verse. 

Stewart delivers as an actor in this. The writers start off the narrative in an intriguing way, setting the stage for events to come that require you to pay attention. 

The story also involves, and completely driven by, my favorite Star Trek character ever, so that’s a huge plus.

It’s an interesting idea, revisiting Picard in his twilight years. TNG was never about fisticuffs and interstellar battles, but younger Picard’s presence had a weight to it. A physicality that was contained in his movements as much as his speechmaking.

 

This version of Picard feels every second of his age, his years of service, and the failures that resulted as a result of his unrelenting need to do the right thing.

Through the actions and inactions of the characters and parties involved, Star Trek: Picard invites you to choose a side. Do you do what is right or what is easy? How far would you go to save your worst enemy? How far would you go to protect your best friend’s legacy?

In true, Star Trek fashion, the decision is not as easy as it first appears. And if you think it is, you clearly missed something.

So the question is: will you like this?

My official answer is to give Picard a chance if:

  1. You love Picard and/or Data (Data rules)
  2. You’re a nostalgia junkie looking to reconnect with as many Trek faces as possible.
  3. You are into intrigue, hidden agendas, and interplanetary politics that also has weapons and fighting.

You will probably not like Picard if:

  1. You hate Star Trek: Discovery (if this is you, just stop following me. You won’t like what’s to come)
  2. You are a purist with no time for any hint of new school sci-fi (action, explosions, combat, etc.).

I am old enough to remember the pain of waiting weeks and weeks before the next episode of Voyager or Enterprise aired, and Picard is no different. So, if you are not too pressed, waiting until it has all come out on CBS All Access and then binge-watching it is an option for you, especially if you can get the 7-Day free trial.

Find me on social media and let me know what your thoughts are. Have you seen Picard? If so, do you like it? 

Why or Why not?

]]>
Ode to Rubeus Hagrid: The Fluffy, Ferocious, Friendliest of Characters https://www.authortlthompson.com/ode-to-rubeus-hagrid-the-fluffy-ferocious-friendliest-of-characters/ Tue, 31 Dec 2019 22:04:17 +0000 http://www.authortlthompson.com/?p=239 + Read More]]>

Among the menagerie of characters and creatures presented to us in the Harry Potter series, one stands head, shoulders, knees, and toes above the rest,

Yes, I am talking about Rubeus Hagrid.

Hagrid is the most fascinating character, hands down, and does not get the credit he deserves from Potterheads crying over Snape (an unrepentant asshole), Dumbledore (a stupid old man who held way too much power for all the nonaction he took), or any of the other characters (besides George, goodnight sweet ginger prince).

Why you may ask, am I so fascinated with Hagrid? Good question. Let’s get into it.

Hagrid is a Rulebreaker

Hagrid does not care about the rules and I have the evidence.

  1. He kept the broken pieces of his wand and put them in a pink umbrella so he could still do magic.
  2. He gambled with perfect strangers in a seedy bar for a dragon’s egg.
  3. He smuggled Aragog into the castle as a second year.
  4. He flew a 16-month-old Harry over Britain in a flying motorbike.

 

Hagrid is a Pioneer

Hagrid is a pioneer of magi-zoology. Fight me about it.

Not only does he successfully take care of the magical creatures in and around his home, he has also made more inroads with other magical races than everyone else.

Magical race here is defined as a magical species with human or greater intellect and communication skills (Magical humans, goblins, Centaurs, Merfolk, House Elves, etc.).

Hagrid also created an entirely new magical species through crossbreeding! Read that again: Hagrid created Blast-Ended Skrewts, an entirely new magical creature, just because he could.

Hagrid has a third-year Wizarding education, his years as the Hogwarts Gamekeeper, and his own natural curiosity and skill and he managed to invent a new species. That is amazing! Especially in a society that still uses ink and quill, open flames for light, and the same general textbooks that Dumbledore used when he was a pimple-faced Gryffindor.

Yes, we now have the Fantastic Beasts movies to show us the splendor of magical creatures. Only…the producers and studio execs couldn’t just give us cool creatures and Eddy Redmayne. No, they had to add the Grindlewald subplot and turn the series, especially the second one, into Dumbledore apology porn.

Beyond that, I do not agree that every Ministry in the world decided to use thestral-driven carriages before Hagrid did. I call foul. Wizards are too ignorant to adore the lovable creatures like Hagrid did.

In conclusion…

Hagrid Is a BAMF

When your best friend is a 90+-year-old giant spider, you automatically get the BAMF award. In addition, he goes above and beyond every other magical in embracing and working with magical creatures.

Magical animal husbandry does exist, of course, we see this in the series. But how many of those magical care for the creatures with no regard for harvesting their magic for power or profit.

Thank you for coming to my TED Talk!

]]>
Oh, Oh Death: A Brief (Very Brief) Analysis of Speculative Media https://www.authortlthompson.com/hello-world/ https://www.authortlthompson.com/hello-world/#comments Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:37:25 +0000 http://authortlthompson.com//?p=1 + Read More]]> Death sucks!

At least, that’s what you may believe if you grew up binging 80s horror films, 90s supernatural dramadies, and 21st century comic book movies.

But here at the Trickster Table, we look at things a little left of center. Cock-eyed as it was.

What we experience as humans, what we feel, touch, taste, see, hear and sense, represents the ultimate context through which we view existence. And only recently in the annals of human history have those who have experienced death been able to come back and tell us about it.

Tales differ of course and recollections of a distant white light can be explained away as hospital florescence. And, as humans have done since time began, we turn toward story to work through our emotions.

So, let’s discuss death as we do all things, within the framework of speculative media!


1. Death is the Enemy

Death has seemed to always represent the Other in the minds of humans (insert GRRM death toll here) and the inevitable result of this mental boxing is that death, no matter the shape or form, is evil.

Now, far be it from me to avoid a talk about the lack of a unified moral code and therefore a fundamental flaw in the definitions of good and evil, but let’s save that for another adventure.

Death is seen as evil because for humanity, life is the only context we have. We live in 3 dimensions, have constructed a feasible metaphor for a 4th, and scientists still debate wildly about many, many others, but that’s all folks.

Prue Halliwell, of Charmed fame, spent her entire life angry at Death for taking her mother from her. As a mega powerful witch, she was able to summon Death. To question him. To admonish him. To berate him.

We’ve sought out creatures like Dracula and Lestat and Angel and even Carlisle to escape Death’s inevitable jaws.

We’ve crafted rituals beyond counting to give praise to gods and goddesses as they shepherd us into the afterlife.


2. Death is a Gift

If you’re a BtVS fan of any level, you should recognize the quote. If not, let me paint you a picture.

Buffy Summers, the Vampire Slayer, is out in the desert of California on a vision quest (side eye) to learn more about her power, the power of the Slayer.

Sineya, the first Slayer to be called, prowls back and forth on the other side of the fire and tells her:

Death is your gift. 

In the wake of one of the saddest TV deaths ever, a’la Joyce Summers in The Body, Buffy was not at all ready to hear that and railed against the idea that death could ever be a gift.

As die hard Scotties, we know this statement to be true. Unlike other heroes, Buffy is one of the few heroes that we have allowed to kill without judgement. A wolf in sheep’s clothing, she and her sister Slayers hunt and kill demons that would gleefully slaughter us all.

And when she inevitably falls in battle, her gift is passed on to the next in the line. A forever warrior to safeguard humanity.


3. Death is a Joke

Humor is another medium we use to attack and process our fears. When it comes to death, the depths of humanity’s fears have spawned infinite variations of comedic sketches and creations.

An honorable mention outside of the speculative fiction realm is the Scream franchise. I’m a sucker for the horror comedy genre and the fun it pokes at more conventional examples.

Looking within the realm of speculative media, we have examples such as The Grimm Adventures of Billy and Mandy cartoon, in which two children gain control over the Grimm Reaper and his hilarious Jamaican accent.

Bill and Ted tricked Death by winning a board game and went on to complete their Excellent Adventure.

There are many more examples of this, but the particular subset I want to focus on is the rash of FDS or faked death syndrome.

When you dwell within the realm of science fiction and fantasy, solutions for thwarting death are to be expected. As a writer, I too have delved into thought puzzles about how to shed the bounds of mortality and how to slay invulnerable beasts (read: Weeping Angels).

But FDS is just the height of lazy writing and cheap emotional manipulation. And it’s pure bullshit besides.

The best example of this comes out of the MCU of course. Nick Fury, Loki, Coulson being the prime examples.

I hear what you’re saying. Marvel can do no wrong. Quit your complaining, blah blah blah.

Comments ignored.

Now the problems with FDS besides the laziness, is that it’s really a trick you can only pull once. But no one seems to understand that.

To repeat myself: Killing/Not Killing a character in your narrative is lazy and should only be done once, if at all. 

Why?

  1. You lose the trust of the consumer if you do it more than once.
  2. The more you do it, the less impact actual deaths have on your narrative and consumers.
  3. It’s Writing 099 and ultimately beneath you.
  4. Cheap emotional manipulation will not work well in the long run.

Now before you bring your pitchforks and torches, consider the alternatives as ways to improve your conflict, characterization, and thus your writing.

  1. Actions must have consequences: if not death, what about some debilitating illness or disability or accident. Conflict drives story and character
  2. Having a surprise not death is possible: the character could be a hidden immortal or secret witch who heals themselves (in this case, proper foreshadowing is key.) Don’t Deus Ex Machina your story
  3. Actual, final death is a great way to shift a narrative or hook the reader. Done too much, too fast, it can cause a devaluing of life. Done not at all can stifle any sense of stakes or urgency.

So, when in doubt, Die!

Or Live.

Or Exist in a Netherspace In Between.

But do consider your personal beliefs about death and your world’s/character’s beliefs when writing.

Til Next Time,

T. L. Thompson

]]>
https://www.authortlthompson.com/hello-world/feed/ 1